Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 11th May 2011 20:35 UTC
Google It was inevitable, of course, and rightfully so: Google is having its big I/O conference, so we have to talk about the lack of Honeycomb's source code. While not violating any licenses, the lack of source code doesn't sit well with many - including myself - so it only makes sense people are asking Google about it. Andy Rubin confirmed we're never going to see Honeycomb's sources as a standalone release. He also explained what 'open' means for Android.
Permalink for comment 472702
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by shmerl
by shmerl on Wed 11th May 2011 20:50 UTC
shmerl
Member since:
2010-06-08

No open development means crippled open source. But I'd even say that open development is really a necessity, not a luxury, for the project which claims to be open source.

Reply Score: 2