Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 12th May 2011 21:10 UTC
Permalink for comment 472943
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-06
"Car makers consider reverse engineering and blatant copying to be perfectly legitimate tactics as long as IP isn't directly infringed."
hence why car manufacturers design specialty tools and attack third party mechanics and auto entusiasts (car hackers) for trying to reverse engineer and understand car computer codes.
"Why yes sir, we understand that you have 30 years of professional experience reparing automobiles but we can't allow you the ODB information and tools to properly assess and repair our recent models because you haven't paid us the exorbitant fee for that privaledge. Why yes, we understand that you are a small town mechanic and that we could instead negotiate a more reasonable fee with you however that wouldn't force car owners back into our dealerships for support. We can't allow that sort of competition to return to the market."
ha.. yeah.. car manufacturers are the apidomy of fair market competition.. sure thing..