Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 16th May 2011 14:21 UTC
Permalink for comment 473396
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-08-23
Um. There wasn't an MS-DOS 6.11. It went 6.0 -> 6.1 -> 6.2 -> 6.21 -> 6.22.
Of course, some OSnews posters used 3.2, 3.3, 4, and 5 as well. Doubtless there are some 1.x and 2.x users around, too. :¬)