Linked by Kroc Camen on Tue 17th May 2011 12:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 473499
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-10-30
You know that your linked article is just counting namespaces and not classes or use of patents.
For example a point struct is best kept in System.Drawing and therefore System.Drawing is included even if no "Patent Promise" exists for this namespace.
So how is it so "Dangerous" to use a point struct?
Doesn't Java have a Point class? Is that "Dangerous" to use as well? Or is it only "Dangerous" if used from C#?
Is short, your spin is disingenuous at best.