Linked by David Adams on Wed 18th May 2011 03:11 UTC
Permalink for comment 473518
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-22
IMHO, this move by Intel is directly aimed at Microsoft.It is (again IMHO) a attempt to get MS not to move to ARM.
Having only a single core CPU is also a failure.
I expect one or two Phone makers to put a toe in the water buy with the architectural freedom that the ARM model gives them I hardly think that this will succeed.
As for the quote 'we will have to pay ARM royalties for every CPU we make'. I had to laugh.
Didn't Intel read the small print on the contract when they signed up for the ARM license? WTF?
Anyways, I hardly think that the small ARM fees per CPU would matter if Intelr were making millions of them in a Fab that might othewise been standing empty & unused.
Fail for obvious reasons.