Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 17th May 2011 20:56 UTC
Permalink for comment 473543
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-10-28
I may not agree with most of that law. But with the part that say "that people are considered responsible for securing their computer and the network it's attached to." isn't totally wrong.
In some countries (Argentina) you are innocent until prove guilty, and also you are owner of everything that is inside you property (house, car, etc). Unless someone prove the oposite. That means you are responsible for everything that's inside.
So if you cars is involve in a back robbery you are accused of been part of it unless you can prove that someone else was driving it (let say it was stolen).
If the police find drugs in you house you are accused of having drugs, unless you can prove that someone else has put it in there.
So if your machines is used for crimes you should prove that you are not involve in it.
Also sniffing any kind of communication (in Argentina) it's illegal and all data that they collect can't be used against you.