Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th May 2011 21:50 UTC, submitted by fran
Windows The ARM version of Windows 8 might have just become the most desired version of Windows in our hearts and minds. After us talking about legacy code and backwards compatibility in Windows for years now, an Intel senior vice president, Renee James, has just stated that Windows 8 on ARM will not have any form of compatibility for legacy applications whatsoever. Update: Microsoft has responded to Intel's claims. "Intel's statements during yesterday's Intel Investor Meeting about Microsoft's plans for the next version of Windows were factually inaccurate and unfortunately misleading," the company said, "From the first demonstrations of Windows on SoC, we have been clear about our goals and have emphasized that we are at the technology demonstration stage. As such, we have no further details or information at this time."
Permalink for comment 473699
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by orestes
by toomuchtatose on Thu 19th May 2011 08:55 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by orestes"
Member since:

As long as the underlying HAL is code-optimised (crucial job for OS developers), developers shouldn't be so engrossed with the performance of the architecture. I think that is his/her perspective.

But of course, the race to productivity is another issue, essentially it is my opinion that not any amount of assembly-optimisation can replace bigger monitors, better desk and chair, a good keyboard and mouse, for work requiring interactivity.

Else, non-interactive work should be relegate to something like itaniums, x86, ppc or sparc....

Reply Parent Score: 2