Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th May 2011 18:59 UTC, submitted by fran
Permalink for comment 473798
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-07-30
You almost got it. But although autotools is showing part of the problem, when you come out of compile-time-detectable library symbols/behavior and go to dynamically changing systems, the situation is orders of magnitude worse.
The idea of a GNOME OS (or E17 OS, KDE OS) would help here, yes. For instance you could just check for that part and assume everything else. "If GNOME/KDE/E17 system then kernel=Linux, libc=GNU, required_libs=present" and yes we could just skip stupid tests in autoconf :-)