Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th May 2011 18:59 UTC, submitted by fran
Permalink for comment 473903
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-08-05
I have long dreamed of a fully integrated GNOME experience from boot up to shutdown. Fact is, the current "way" is a mess. Developers just grab a bunch of projects, make them "almost" work well together, and call it an operating system.
As a FreeBSD enthusiast I am only slightly disappointed, and I honestly believe that FreeBSD would have been the better choice here. However I respect their choice with choosing the Linux kernel, and hopefully instead of making just another distro, the GNOME developers really do something completely different and up to par with the level of quality and integration of Windows or OS X. Even if they have to re-invent the wheel, integration is the key!
I look forward to (one day) installing GNOME OS on my desktop.
Edited 2011-05-20 06:36 UTC