Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th May 2011 18:59 UTC, submitted by fran
Permalink for comment 473954
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-07-30
I never said that OSX lacked udev (or as someone else wrote in this thread: inotify). I just said that instead of writing code for GNOME (KDE, E17, ...) considering that udev may or may not be available, we should all focus on the systems we use, and it's clear the majority is Linux. If there are non-Linux developers, fine, they can "waste" their time reworking the internals to make both work.
To be clear, and using your example: Why MacOSX would care about GNOME? Why GNOME would care about MacOSX?