Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 18th May 2011 21:50 UTC, submitted by fran
Windows The ARM version of Windows 8 might have just become the most desired version of Windows in our hearts and minds. After us talking about legacy code and backwards compatibility in Windows for years now, an Intel senior vice president, Renee James, has just stated that Windows 8 on ARM will not have any form of compatibility for legacy applications whatsoever. Update: Microsoft has responded to Intel's claims. "Intel's statements during yesterday's Intel Investor Meeting about Microsoft's plans for the next version of Windows were factually inaccurate and unfortunately misleading," the company said, "From the first demonstrations of Windows on SoC, we have been clear about our goals and have emphasized that we are at the technology demonstration stage. As such, we have no further details or information at this time."
Permalink for comment 474060
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: It makes sense
by pgeorgi on Fri 20th May 2011 23:45 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: It makes sense"
Member since:

assembly->C is hard

It's only hard if you want to get a higher level view of what's going on (ie. "decompile").

For mere translation it's easy: create a struct representing all registers, then replace "mov %eax, 0" with "registers.eax = 0" and so on. x86/ARM even shares endianess and register size (in the common configurations).

It will look ugly, it will be lots of "goto" statements, but a C compiler will happily create acceptable ARM assembly from that.

Reply Parent Score: 1