Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th May 2011 18:59 UTC, submitted by fran
Permalink for comment 474105
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Wasn't meant to make you lough, but OK, thanks, I guess.
So was DOS, Windows 3.11 and Linux kernel 2.2.
Like you, I've got far too many years of experience in developing application (and servers) that run on Unix and Linux.
And each and every time I had to manually develop some way to handle socket activation and service dependencies.
Now, given my very limited experience with systemd I can't really comment on it - but I can say that it's time to kill SysV and friends.
As much as I dislike Windows service manager's way of doing things (the management and control interfaces are far too complex and the service registration and logging can easily get damaged leaving you with a dead service with no way of knowing what's wrong) - their dependency tracking is far more suitable to this day-and-age than the ancient runlevel used by SysV.
I don't think you fully understand what systemd is trying to achieve.
Fast boot is a ***minor*** part of it.
As the uptake of systemd like alternative init systems increases, it's just a matter of time till KDE faces the same problem GNOME is.
(For the record, I'm mostly using KDE/Fedora 14 and I reboot my machines [including my netbook]) only when there's a major security fix that requires a new kernel [practically never])
- Gilboa