Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 20th May 2011 20:37 UTC
Permalink for comment 474127
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:39 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 11:32 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 19:39 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-09-06
Security really can't be compared to market share.
Security relates to how well a thing resists attack not how many attack attempts it receives. A thing that resists five out of ten attacks (50%) is more secure than a thing that resists two out of six attacks (33%) even though six attacks is less "market share" than ten attacks.
In terms of market share (popularity), a thing that becomes more popular still had all those un-found vulnerabilities before gaining popularity.
OSX may be getting more attempts against it now due to popularity but exploitable vulnerabilities discovered still existed before now. It was still just as insecure against attempts before as it is now.
Small market share is actually obscurity not security.
Obscurity; I hide behind a corner and you can't see me until you walk around the corner. I'm obscured only until you know where to look.
Security; I hide behind a corner but you can't walk around it and see me because you'd have to get through the locked gate between us.
The first provides no real resistance to finding me where the second does provides some form of resistance to your attempts at walking around the corner.