Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 19th May 2011 18:59 UTC, submitted by fran
Permalink for comment 474154
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-09-23
Which was ported to FreeBSD and lives happily in the ports tree, should anyone really need it. "
Nice, I didn't know that!
So, there should be a chance to write some "glue code" which would make GNOME use launchd on *BSD instead of systemd, shouldn't there?
Didn't someone already mention in this thread that Poettering himself said that he would rather see people write a BSD-specific version of systemd instead of putting too much bloat into the systemd sources by porting it to non-Linux platforms?
With that in mind, I think the situation with GNOME depending on systemd is probably far less problematic than many would think =).
Actually, I like FreeBSD for adopting a lot of nice things from the enterprise world like zfs and launchd. BSD is obviously better off in this regard when they don't have to reinvent the wheel (btrfs, systemd) but can simply use software which is already around.
Adrian
Edited 2011-05-21 22:18 UTC