Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Tue 24th May 2011 14:38 UTC, submitted by Debjit
Permalink for comment 474442
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/14/13 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
"Yes, because there are people like myself living in the southern hemisphere, where November is summer, not winter. :-)"
Gosh you're right!
"Using years as a version number just seems bad to me. That will make software very quickly dated. Example, running Windows Server 2008 in the year 2011. That makes windows sound very old and outdated."
I honestly don't see how this is a problem?
"I say, stick with major.minor numbers and be done with it."
The arbitrariness doesn't bug you? At least the date gives us an idea of the age.
My car is a 2.36 Toyota Corolla.