Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Wed 25th May 2011 15:09 UTC, submitted by sawboss
Permalink for comment 474746
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
"And what gives you the idea that the Russians, Chinese, Israelis and French didn't do it?"
I don't know if they can or cannot compile it themselves, but I somewhat doubt microsoft would allow them that privilege.
The thing is, the notion that anyone having the source knows whether windows is secure seems a little implausible.
Vulnerabilities can creep up in innocent looking code. That would always offer plausible denyability.
When a security update comes in, countries in possession of the code could indeed locate the vulnerabilities in the source, but where is the evidence that it was accidental or deliberate? It's not like MS would label a backdoor as "NSAKey" or something.