Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Fri 27th May 2011 11:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 474908
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-06-30
Well, that's a simple MVC pattern at work, which is also a kind of an asynchronous framework. I wouldn't call it a bad programming practice, quite the opposite. It does what it is designed for - separating concerns. The idea is that you do what you want to do on the Model and leave the task of updating the View to the framework.
And it works well too, if only you remember not to use the naive implementation for anything but the simplest models.