Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 30th May 2011 22:04 UTC
Permalink for comment 475253
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-12
OT because I don't have stats for Ubuntu, but I did take my standard Fedora configuration and compare the amount of space it uses (excluding /root and /home) with a similarly-confugured installation of Arch. I'm running an LXDE desktop in both cases. Results: Arch is less bloated by a whopping 2% (2462 MB vs. 2516 MB). I expect Ubuntu to produce similar results. Obviously, this is a big YMMV situation, but I thought the results were interesting.