Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 29th May 2011 21:29 UTC, submitted by teigetje
Permalink for comment 475316
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-12
(*hm* I got the impression that you don't follow the same route of reasoning when Apple is mentioned, do you?)
Well, beauty is only skin deep. Judging from the ugly file system "tricks" I've seen so far, MS still hasn't learned to stick to clean, simple and transparent concepts.
Only if you like to be chained in the MS software stack. Windows Server is still massively laking outside of pure MS environments.
ACK. They didn't simply copy Apple.
Somewhat different would be more to the point.
*LOL*
*hm*
So MS has technical fine products but a crazy management. Sorry, no. Wake me up when those technical fine products are able to properly interoperate in a non MS world.