Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Sun 29th May 2011 09:42 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes It's funny how trying to have a consistent system design makes you constantly jump from one area of the designed OS to another. I initially just tried to implement interrupt handling, and now I'm cleaning up the design of an RPC-based daemon model, which will be used to implement interrupt handlers, along with most other system services. Anyway, now that I get to something I'm personally satisfied with, I wanted to ask everyone who's interested to check that design and tell me if anything in it sounds like a bad idea to them in the short or long run. That's because this is a core part of this OS' design, and I'm really not interested in core design mistakes emerging in a few years if I can fix them now. Many thanks in advance.
Permalink for comment 475553
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[26]: Comment by Kaj-de-Vos
by xiaokj on Thu 2nd Jun 2011 00:38 UTC in reply to "RE[25]: Comment by Kaj-de-Vos"
xiaokj
Member since:
2005-06-30

Alfman,

Nah, I had realised a bit late about your injections -- the comment system did not notify me.

I suppose, given the recent increases in the comment count, there must have been more.

I think the reason why you did not see anything objectionable is that I have provided a very vague notion, although I do point out the relevant places I got those ideas from. You simply had nothing solid to poke at! I really should get my hand dirty in some form of computing practice...

Reply Parent Score: 2