Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Jun 2011 00:39 UTC
Permalink for comment 475818
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-12-13
Exactly...
It reminds me of HP's iMac wannabe touch screen computers, that had this rather nice looking, touch enabled UI - right until the point when you had to get any 'real' work done, and you were back to good old Windows ...
So touch based or not; I don't buy this duality as being a viable and efficient interface concept ... -Sorry, Redmond!