Linked by ebasconp on Fri 10th Jun 2011 22:22 UTC
Permalink for comment 476882
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-19
Very few people can write code as good as a modern C++ compiler.
I work with a guy who kept bragging about how great his LU factorization that he hand-coded directly in assembler is. Well, turns out this clown wrote it using the ancient x87 FP stack, he never heard of SSE (this was a few months ago).
So, I through together a quick and dirty LU factorization in C++ (OK, copied it out of numerical recipes), compiled it with gcc 4.4, enable SSE, and it was about 20 freaking times faster than his "hand tuned assembler"
And when the next great SSE 4,5,6... comes out, all I do is re-compile:)
Unless they have a really really good reason for doing it, when someone tells you they want to write something in assembler, you should probably back hand them.