Linked by David Adams on Thu 16th Jun 2011 17:46 UTC
Permalink for comment 477438
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-18
OMG I thought you would have more intelligence than this to say something soo stupid.
A good developer is a good developer in any language.
According to your logic ... I learnt how to program in BBC BASIC, does that mean I am still trapped in only writing programs in BBC BASIC?
Also According to your logic, I learnt how to program OO in Java, does that mean I can only do OO programming in Java?
Good devs will learn the principles rather than the toolkit ... and take those ideas elsewhere.
Whether they learn them using a .NET framework or an alternative open source one is irrelevant.
There is going to be an underlying theory on how these devices work and without that you won't be able to program these well even if you know the SDK inside out.
It just an SDK to make it easier for .NET devs to develop stuff for what is essentially a USB device.
Also if students and hackers learn some knowledge about how to program and how these devices work ... how can this possibly be a bad thing?
Personally I hope some cool things come out of it.