Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 17th Jun 2011 18:49 UTC
Permalink for comment 477588
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-19
Thom: It is in governments' natures to control where it is not needed, to regulate what doesn't need regulating, and to bureaucratise that which is efficient.
Eh this is the same Thom who was so in favour of giving the Dutch government powers to regulate ISPs? Making a few companies illegal providing essential services for users along the way?
I.e. certain companies in The Netherlands provided filtering services for people who chose them as an ISP. But that's now illegal.
But usually people who are against government legislation are for it when they like it. I.e. they are against certain government legislation which is inconvenient for them, but for it when it is convenient.
Thanks Thom for a totally consistent message. But perhaps you have seen the light. Welcome aboard in that case.
Edited 2011-06-17 19:53 UTC