Linked by Andrew Hudson on Mon 20th Jun 2011 17:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 477902
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
Breaking software into shared libraries and using dependency resolution greatly reduces bandwidth and vastly improves security (one library can be updated instead of every packages on the system). Yes, there are some downsides.
Every so often some developer won't test changes properly and something will break, and it means users can't just drag-n-drop an application to a new machine and expect it to work. There is a trade-off. But demanding everyone move to all-in-one bundles ignores the fact that a lot of users don't want them. Even some who think they do change their minds once they see the problems that arise.
Generally speaking, not really. Just software developers seem to complain about it.Most of them are unix and linux zealots, so who cares.