Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Jun 2011 09:33 UTC
Permalink for comment 477945
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-05-14
DuckDuckGo has been around for a while now. Longer than Cuil and Blekko. I remember seeing comments about it on this site in fact.
I think the problem with Google (and Bing) is that they are controlled by a large companies. If DuckDuckGo ever becomes large then we'd basically have another Google (or Bing) on our hands. It's like how Facebook started out really caring about privacy until they had network effects to keep their users inline.
With general purpose search the network effects have to do with the search index, technology, and most importantly data center size. This is why there are only 2 competitive wholesale search engines around. It would take a massive amount of funding and/or time to reach Google's or even Bing's capabilities.
Also, "Switching" a search engine is meaningless. It's not like AT&T vs Verizon vs Sprint. You can use any search engine at any time. You don't have to stick to just one.