Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Jun 2011 22:28 UTC
Apple "So Apple got yet another patent granted today, and now there's yet another media firestorm over whether it means Cupertino will be able to sue every other phone manufacturer out of business, or at least out of the business of making multitouch devices. And, as usual, most of the hysteria is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of what the patent claims actually say, and what behaviors they actually cover in iOS. I don't know why we keep repeating this sad cycle, but I do know that it’s always, always better for us to read the claims and try to figure them out for ourselves - and in this case,they're actually pretty narrow."
Permalink for comment 478368
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: US patents
by SlothNinja on Thu 23rd Jun 2011 12:14 UTC in reply to "RE: US patents"
Member since:

Yes. But, not quite for the reason stated. A US patent only covers activities in the US. So, if a product is made, sold, offered for sale, exported from, or imported into the US, the product is subject to the US patent. For example, a product manufactured in Asia and sold in Europe even by a US company generally is not covered by a US patent barring odd circumstances (e.g., shipped through the US).

The reason it matters for the rest of the world is that the US is a sizable market. It's not uncommon for a company to simply forgo making a product if it's not able to sell such product in the US due to patent restrictions.

Reply Parent Score: 1