Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Jun 2011 22:47 UTC
Permalink for comment 478438
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-10-20
According to the source of the article (the CNET article), it looks like it's "voluntary" for now - but I wouldn't be surprised if there's sweeteners like easier licensing for content for participating ISPs and things like media companies requiring content licensors to block non-participating ISPs. Not saying that's what it involves, just that I wouldn't be surprised.
I wonder how they define customer too?
If someone's reselling a big carrier's services, are they a "customer" who will have adherence forced upon them by the supplier?
Or even worse - what about TRANSIT "customers" - if a big ISP that provides transit for non-US sourced/destined traffic decides to start treating foreign IPs or netblocks or ASNs as copyright infringers...?
I'm not even in the US and it worries me!