Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Jun 2011 09:33 UTC
Permalink for comment 478492
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-09-11
I know DDG for at least 1 year. I tested it for a few days. While for some search terms it was relevant, for the most it was way less relevant than Google.
For me, the most important aspect of a search engine is being relevant. Not being simple or being small, or not being Google.
Right now, I find Google to be the most relevant, followed by Bing/Yahoo.
DDG isn't even a search engine. It's a search engine aggregator, a metacrawler. It internally uses Google and other search engines to find the results. While this might be ok, not having good algorithms for filtering and returning the results based on relevance, is not ok at all.