Linked by Hadrien Grasland on Sat 25th Jun 2011 08:55 UTC, submitted by John
Permalink for comment 478554
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-10
That's just not a correct statement. It's the answer you often hear engineers and computer scientists give because we want to do everything with our computers.
It's always a trade off between usability and security.
We could do all sorts of things... but of course they would kill some aspect of usability.
- only run 'trusted' software... signed binaries and verified by the OS
- only allow (untrusted?) applications to install to their own directory and only allow them access to their own files.
- all executables must be registered/installed by with the OS. They cannot be run otherwise.
...