Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Jun 2011 15:04 UTC
Apple Well, this just got interesting. There's been a bit of a backlash over Apple's Final Cut X Pro, which is considered a step down from previous versions by many professional videographers, as they claim it lacks countless features - leading to the nickname 'iMovie Pro'. Former Shake product designer and former Apple employee Ron Brinkmann has now weighed in on the situation. His advice to professionals? Don't rely on companies like Apple.
Permalink for comment 479220
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
phoudoin
Member since:
2006-06-09

I don't agree with your statement about the X. I mean going from version 7 to version ten is a damn big leap don't you think? So you have to think that the X is just a way for Apple to denote a huge change in the software. The same happened with Quicktime. Quicktime X and quiktime 7 aren't using the same codebase.


I didn't remember QuickTime X dropping backward compatibility or not supporting earlier versions features of QuickTime. Do you?

New codebase is neither a selling feature neither an valid excuse.

Anyone who has been following Apple over the years would know this.


They also know that MacOS X provides backward compatibility with previous MacOS version, that QuickTime X provides backward compatibility with previous version. Even if they were new codebase.

So, how one could know by himself that FCP X wont be backward compatible or wont support at least the set of Pro features that does previous version of FCP?

By reading on the box?
Nope, nothing there.
By reading the press release?
Nope, nothing there.

So did all of those these professionals, who btw were cheering their asses off when Apple demoed FCPX at NAB,


FCP X "preview" was demoed at NAB. It was not released in store yet then. It is now.
And nothing inform buyers about the broken backward compatibility or the features set which don't cover Pro ones. It was not said during NAB either.

You can twist it as much as you want, the facts are that they present it as the *new* Final Cut Pro version without saying it's not backward compatible.

but now choose to complain about what is essentially a completely different platform and software.


Then give it a completly different name, for god sake!

Where Apple did fail is completely dropping support for FCP7, though imo, if you are a professional who uses FCP then you should already have the software. Apple isn't going to your Mac and removing the software.


Now. But could you bet that Mac App Store won't ever do that when upgrading a product?
What would happened if the Mac App Store upgrade process had remove FCP 7 to replace with FCP X?
Oh, sure, Apple will have fixed it a few days or weeks, but until that, no access to existing FCP projects!?
That's money loss.

I'm sorry, but maybe that a risk consumers could accept, but pros really can't. There is enough stuff that could jeopardize your business, you don't need some software provider to screw your workstation.

And Apple just send the signal this risk is increasing with their FCP product.
The least pros can do is sending back the signal that they won't accept it.

Reply Parent Score: 3