Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 1st Jul 2011 22:59 UTC
Permalink for comment 479409
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-12-05
If this downloadable "content" in question doesn't actively try to police me, treat me as a thief, and limit my use of it (ie. DRM), then I'd gladly pay for it. If it does do these things though... even if it's only a dime... I'll obtain it illegally for $0.00 before I'd pay the company even ten cents.
But really, I'm far more likely to just not buy it, not download it, period. There is other stuff out there--and if a company feels that they need to control and limit me, then I immediately lose any desire to do business with them and they can shove their DRM-infected bullshit right up their asses.
Edited 2011-07-02 05:30 UTC