Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 6th Jul 2011 15:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 479931
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-08-18
What is Microsoft´s problem here?
What is stopping them from running a wholly-owned subsidiary in EU jurisdiction, that handles all servers, etc, for it´s users? US requests Patriot shake-down: That info isn´t subject to US requests, as it´s wholly located in EU jurisdiction. US Patriot Act to my knowledge (yes, that´s a big black hole obviously, with ´secret interpretations´ and all) does not impede or impose penalties on US corporations which invest in foreign businesses which aren´t subject to US law. I mean, I guess it should also be mentioned how pretty much all US tech companies are in bed with the National Security State, etc, and so wouldn´t WANT to do such a horrible thing, but it seems like there´s a pretty easy legal out for MS in this case IF THEY WANTED TO PARTAKE OF IT...???