Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Jul 2011 17:36 UTC, submitted by vivainio
Linux Linux.FR has an interview with Lennart Poettering of PulseAudio and systemd fame (among others). Regarding PulseAudio: "I can understand why people were upset, but quite frankly we didn't really have another option than to push it into the distributions when we did. While PulseAudio certainly wasn't bug-free when the distributions picked it up the majority of issues were actually not in PulseAudio itself but simply in the audio drivers. PulseAudio's timer-based scheduling requires correct timing information supplied by the audio driver, and back then the drivers weren't really providing that. And that not because the drivers were really broken, but more because the hardware was, and the drivers just lacked the right set of work-arounds, quirks and fixes to compensate for it."
Permalink for comment 480047
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Also, why?
by Lennie on Thu 7th Jul 2011 21:04 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Also, why?"
Member since:

Because this is about drivers and hardware ? And we need people to test it and let's be honest, a lot of the times in Linux you are the tester. It isn't like in the Windows-world where the manufacturer will do all the testing with the platform.

I didn't think Ubuntu was the right place, But Fedora was probably more appropriate.

Fedore seems to be more aimed at developers and Ubuntu at 'normal users' (whatever that means).

Edited 2011-07-07 21:04 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3