Linked by David Adams on Wed 20th Jul 2011 15:13 UTC
Permalink for comment 481894
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-12
Actually, the installer blesses a new boot bundle on the same partition, reboots from that and then starts creating the Recovery partition as part of the install process from what I've read.
Other than that, there's nothing whatsoever important about "dist-upgrade". It's just a buzzword. The end result is the same. Though, Ubuntu still won't let users install the latest and great versions of their favorite apps without upgrading their entire OS. So, I can see why some would place importance on something like dist-upgrade.
Resizing partitions has been a no-brainer on Macs for quite a few years (since at least 2006 with the advent of BootCamp). I've not heard of any memorable catastrophes but I'm sure they've happened on very rare occasions. I'm sure dist-upgrades fail more often than partition resizing on Macs. However, everyone should have a current back-up before trying anything remotely major such as this, right?