Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Jul 2011 14:10 UTC, submitted by Jennimc
Permalink for comment 481969
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-03-08
Quite right, Adobe Flash is the prime cause, but this shouldn't have stopped browser-makers from making the 64bit browsers. If there was demand for a working 64bit flash plugin Adobe might have made one work before now. Either way it is a moot point, 64Bit flash is only really starting to be an idea with flash 11 beta. All i was trying to say was that the fault for a lack of 64bit Firefox wasn't the fault of Windows or Microsoft directly.