Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Jul 2011 22:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 482488
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-05-19
Both sides are hypocritical bul****ers. Apple being the most aggressive in the legal department, however.
That is why they should beat Exxon in market cap. Those people on the US stock market are helluva optimists, if you ask me... Apple beating Exxon just plain sounds like a joke....
If they aren't, then they should be worried. The premium smartphone market will be saturated soon enough and Apple will be left out cold with their current product offerings.
It'll be the same as Mac Books, great sales, great profits - but not much growth.(Their product offerings are premium segment only. I maintain that their notebook growth is in line with premium priced notebook market growth, so they didn't beat the market.)