Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Jul 2011 22:09 UTC
Permalink for comment 482519
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-13
I'm not sure that they do. Or if they do, then I question if they learned anything from.
I remember the Apple ][ vs IBM PC war, I remember the Mac vs Windows war. Both started off with Apple earning first-mover advantage with an innovative product that garnered leading market share and industry support that eventually deteriorated due to their un-yielding stubbornness and un-willingness to adapt to the different demands of a larger and more diverse market.
To me this is deja vu all over again. Apple has achieved tremendous market success with the iPhone and has the industry clamoring to catch up. I've seen this episode before and know how it eventually ends.
Jobs has some brilliant ideas. While most people gush about him being a visionary, I don't really think he is. I think the real secret to his success is his ability to execute. The man has an idea and he can drive it and make it happen with a better track record of success than just about any CEO I can think of in recent history.
But the same quality of character that demands perfection and control over his products simply does not scale beyond a certain size, and that is why Apple will inevitably be eclipsed. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.