Linked by David Adams on Wed 3rd Aug 2011 16:50 UTC, submitted by _xmv
Permalink for comment 483580
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
So OK, FF is better than Chrome if you open 150 tabs simultaneously, but who does that??
Nobody: you open tabs, close some, open other, etc and in the end you may have a big number of tabs open (though 150 seems excessive to me: 50 would be more interesting).
This would be a better test, and the results may be different: the architecture of Chrome may allow better resource management than thread oriented FF..
Also he should try his benchmark with different settings: it's possible to configure Chrome to use only one process, I wonder if the resource usage would be very different..