Linked by David Adams on Wed 3rd Aug 2011 16:10 UTC, submitted by Sin2x
Permalink for comment 483627
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
If a mouse click costs you 5 seconds, then you obviously haven't learned to use it well enough, and thus underestimate its usefulness.
I have a scenario here (for people doing software development). Let's say you are at the middle of programming and have modified 10 files. For the next commit, you are only going to commit 2 of those 10 files. You do not know the paths of the 2 files off the top of your head, but you can tell straight away by glancing at the hg/git/svn status output (or whatever your IDE shows to you). What would be your workflow, without using a mouse?
Edited 2011-08-04 13:06 UTC