Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 9th Aug 2011 17:32 UTC
Permalink for comment 484536
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-12
No. Your arguement would only make sense if Apple didn't have the monopoly over Mac OS X, and there were dozens of brands offering (legal) Mac OS X compatible computers. The Windows-based PC market is very segregated because people can choose. So it is your logic the one that is idiotic.
This is illogical yet again. The iPhone is the #1 selling smartphone. Should it be discounted because Apple has a "monopoly" over iOS? Yes, the iPhone is SUCH a failure. lol
Since you talk of people that "filter data to suit" you certainly display a run-away knack for it. There is nothing wrong with comparing hardware brand against hardware brand.
...and yet Apple is just as successful as other hardware makers.
The fact that I mentioned Apple owning the high-end PC market is not selective filtering, it's merely pointing to the fact of how successful they have been and with a healthy markup to boot.
Edited 2011-08-11 02:03 UTC