
Day 2 is underway in the Apple v. Samsung case in The Netherlands, a microcosm of what would have happened in Germany, had Germany implemented the concept of due process. Most interesting bit so far? Samsung is using the
Knight Ridder tablet from 1994 as a case of prior art. I was unaware of this device, but be sure to watch the video - this
is an iPad. Amazing. This doesn't actually surprise me though - my father worked at a large newspaper company his entire life until he retired a few years ago, and in the early '90s, he already attended demonstrations of devices like this, taking home promotional material that amazed my child brain. This was supposed to be the future of newspapers, until development on these kinds of devices suddenly halted - my father never understood why.
Update: Forgot to mention that like yesterday, Andreas Udo de Haes, editor at
WebWereld.nl,
present in the court room, is covering this. This time, in English.
Update II: Samsung
has presented 20 cases of prior art for both tablets and smartphones.
Update III: I'm liking
Samsung's lawyers.
Member since:
2006-06-22
Selling them faster is the only fact in this statement, everything else is your opinion (and quite wrong one too)
That playing field may level, sure, but Apple are trying to put a stop to that early on. If the market becomes awash with a mass of tablets, it only waters down their message.
I believe you were trying to say "water down their profits", no? As for the message, Apple has no clue what so ever. Thay are masters of lying, stealing, etc.
Apple can compete, they just don't want to have to get to that. They want to be permanently ahead of the market by crippling any competition first, before it becomes real competition. They've seen how the PC market played out in the 80s and don't want a repeat that left Apple in last place and close to dying.
History shows that they cannot compete, that is why they are resorting to litigation.