Linked by snydeq on Fri 12th Aug 2011 19:05 UTC
GNU, GPL, Open Source Google has finally acknowledged that its characterization of Android as open source is false and, in the end, this can only make the mobile platform stronger, InfoWorld's Galen Gruman argues. 'It's hard for believers to accept that open source brings with it difficulties, but look at the consistent failure of the other open source mobile platforms -- Moblin, Maemo, and MeeGo -- that all devolved into grad-student-like thought experiments and personal pet projects. Users don't want that, and ultimately products are sold to users.' Instead, Google has been quietly taking parts of Android back in house to develop them purposefully and deeply, and as Google has asserted more control over Android, it's improved.
Permalink for comment 485001
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

The article spreads FUD. Android is FLOSS and there is no way to argue about that. That is what the GPL is all about.

Many parts of Android are not under the GPL. For example the libc is from NetBSD, under the BSD licence.

Reply Parent Score: 2