Linked by snydeq on Fri 12th Aug 2011 03:55 UTC
Permalink for comment 485050
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-06-29
Citation needed. Maybe you got confused with their problem of finding the Higgs boson?
You got benchmarks? Some astrophysical simulation written in fortran against the same thing written in C?
Fortran is easy to learn. That's why most scientists who engage in number crunching use it like an everyday tool and not like a shiny/beautiful asset to show off.
You assume that recently built supercomputers are running fortran code that's decades old?
And that's why a google search with (+fortran supernova simulation) yields 136000 no-nonsense hits?