
Okay once again I'm breaking my own one-week time-off from OSNews due to, you know, taking a break and being too busy with other things, but this one is big - very big. Also, only the
second time in OSNews history we've used the 'breaking'-tag. Google has
just announced it is going to buy Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion (more
here). While providing Google with a dedicated mobile phone business, it also gives Google ownership of one of the most valuable mobile technology patent portfolios in existence.
Update: Responses from the Android ecosystem are positive. HTC: "We welcome the news of today's acquisition, which demonstrates that Google is deeply committed to defending Android, its partners, and the entire ecosystem." Sony Ericsson & LG: "We welcome Google's commitment to defending Android and its partners."
Member since:
2006-01-25
That is not my understanding. I wish you were right, but my understanding is:
1. The WebM pool is only relevant for patents that are applicable to WebM - MMI certainly may have some patents that fall into that category, but the vast majority are certainly not related to WebM at all.
2. The OIN does not prohibit members from suing each other - that is just not true at all. It prohibits members from filing suit over Linux. Now what exactly that means when boiled down to legalize I'm not entirely sure, but it certainly does not preclude members from suing each other if it is NOT related to Linux.
More importantly, it does not require members to donate any of their patents to the pool - they certainly can if they want to, but they are merely required to license the members of the pool to any patent that is applicable to Linux (which in reality simply means members cannot sue each other over Linux). As such the majority of MMIs patents (which are mostly patents on communication technology) are not relevant.