Linked by snydeq on Tue 16th Aug 2011 16:46 UTC
Permalink for comment 485444
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
The big problem I have with HTML5 is the attempt to do a whole heap of changes all at once rather than a bit by bit piecemeal approach where the most important (but non-controversial) things can be standardised and deployed straight away and spend more time on the more complex controversial things that don't need immediate deployment.
Take video and audio - that is the the number one reason why most people have Flash installed in the first place, so that they can watch YouTube and other video services. The focus should be on low hanging fruit like that and not marketing HTML5 as some sort of swiss army knife that'll slice, dice and keep the lettuce fresh for up to 5 days.
HTML5 isn't the be all and end all but for a large number of people once those low hanging fruit are addressed the the need to have it installed pretty much evaporates pretty quickly. Does Flash have a place in the future? sure it does but it shouldn't be at the expense where we have advertisers playing obnoxiously flashing videos.