Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Aug 2011 17:27 UTC
Permalink for comment 485471
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-08-17
Guess I am the only dissenting opinion here.
Let's get real all. Apple is doing exactly what it's Board of Director's are demanding it does, and what Google is prepared to do itself. Say what you will, but Samsung IS ripping off Apple's designs and you are either blind or or too anti-Apple to admit it. Apple should sue, they should be paid for the fruits of their labor rather than having some also-rans in Asia, where IP theft is order of the day (I exclude the Japanese of course), clean their clocks. They attract the best talent in the industry to turn out the best products. Apple cannot be profitable if other bloodsuckers are eating their lunch.
It's totally disingenuous to say Apple is being anti-competitive. Does that mean that patent laws do not need to be reformed, he'll no.