Linked by David Adams on Tue 16th Aug 2011 16:47 UTC
Permalink for comment 485558
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-12-28
I don't know about system z, I'm no sys-prog, but I do know about LoP (Linux on POWER) and compared to AIX, it's a joke. No support for software RAID boot partitions, buggy SAN mulipath drivers and every time I've seen an installation, it's needed to be heavily optimized due to it having lower (and sometimes much lower) I/O performance than AIX. Bad I/O on a POWER system is an oxymoron.
Sure, LoP is OK I guess as a test LPAR but as you've got all the open source server software you need already compiled for AIX, why the hell would you want to add an extra support contract for what is arguably a less powerful OS for your expensive POWER system when you get AIX support added in already?
As for system Z, my sys-prog mates think it's great cause they can implement open source server software without the humongous license fees but again, that's not because zLinux is somehow better than zOS.