Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th Aug 2011 19:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 485889
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-09-01
HP has a history of doing this to consumer technologies, so this was written on the wall before the ink on the contract was dry.
HP is crap on the consumer side. Their stuff has been under engineered and overpriced for years. Their business tech is pretty good, but not the consumer stuff.
WebOS would have been a contender if they would have been bought by a company that said, "Build cool stuff. Hardware releases every six months, software releases every three, go" they might have had a shot, but HP goes cheap.
Yes they are, and the PC arm has been bleeding for years. Only the profits from EDS and ProCurve were keeping HP in the black.
Services and enterprise equipment is what's going to save HP. Seriously, look no further then IBM for an example, and HP has a better hardware stack then IBM does. Let's look at an example between a tablet and a server.
Tablet: $500 + HP official cover = $550 or so.
Server: $10,000 + Multi-year support/services contract + ProCurve switches + HP storage = the cost of the tablet being a rounding error.
Let Apple or whoever have the consumer market. Lock down the production side of things, and don't care how they access the servers.
Edited 2011-08-18 22:09 UTC