Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 18th Aug 2011 19:34 UTC
Permalink for comment 486124
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-13
They aren't dumping their server line, but they're dumping corporate desktops and laptops. There is no money in them.
At one time, when companies were shelling out $1500-$2000+ for desktops, they rarely hesitated attaching a service contract to them. That's where HP made their money.
Nowadays, companies use $399 throw-away desktops where if something breaks, they pull a spare out of the closet and fire it up. There's no more money in it for HP to sell on-site maintenance contracts.
As for the laptops, it is growing, mostly at the expense of the desktop market, but that doesn't mean there is money in it. Dell, HP, Lenovo et al. have their laptops manufactured by the same pool of Asian mega-manufacturers, there's really little to differentiate in any sort of profitable way.
The PC space is their only division that has low single digit margins and is declining.
Cisco came to a similar realization that the consumer market was simply not worth the investment to compete in. They dumped the flip line despite the investment they made, rather than continuing to throw resources at it. There's talk that they're looking to dump Linksys as well, and with their entry into the enterprise server space, they're aiming squarely at HP's core business. Add to that Oracle leveraging their Sun acquisition to target HP, and the fact that IBM has already put their loss-leading PC business behind them and successfully re-invented themselves as a enterprise services-oriented organization, and the writing is on the wall.
There's absolutely no way this was a quick decision. I suspect it was part of the conversation when the board started interviewing him for the job and that he was hired to do precisely what he has just announced.
I wouldn't be surprised if the Touchpad was released simply to try and increase the value of Palm as an asset to sell, but realizing that it was tanking, they simply pulled the plug to reduce their loss rather than throwing more resources to keep it alive.